English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The radicalism issue has become an international concern since the 911 tragedy. Unfortunately, the growth of global radicalism is mainly connected to Muslims. In Indonesia, defining radicalism remains a disparity. This variance also occurs in Indonesia’s primary mass Islamic organisations: Nahdhatul Ulama (NU) and Muhammadiyah. This study investigated the different schemata of radicalism from both organisations. Data was gathered from books, news, and articles about radicalism published by both organisations, including statements of important figures from NU and Muhammadiyah. Entman’s framing analysis is applied to explain the definition, cause, moral judgment, and solution of radicalism offered by each organisation. This study found the altered reason behind using the term ‘deradicalization’ by NU, and ‘moderation’ by Muhammadiyah represent a different focus on action and how NU and Muhammadiyah relationships with the Government.

Deradicalisation or moderation? (The counter-radicalism framing of Muhammadiyah and Nahdhatul Ulama in Indonesia)