English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

PURPOSETo evaluate the diagnostic benefit of time-resolved CENTRA-keyhole contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography (CE-CMRA) for improving arterial-venous separation of pulmonary vessels.METHODSTwenty-three patients (18 males; age = 58 +/- 11y) after radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation to treat atrial fibrillation were examined using CENTRA-keyhole based multi-phase 3D CE-CMRA yielding 6 near-isotropic 3D datasets every 1.6 s (50-60 coronal partitions, 1.4 x 1.4 x 1.3 mm, SENSE-factor 3). Results were compared with conventional non-keyhole CE-CMRA (identical parameters, SENSE-factor 2).RESULTSData acquisition was accelerated by a speedup factor of approximately 9 compared with the reference CE-CMRA (SENSE 1.5*, keyhole 6*). No pulmonary venous stenoses were detected by either method, overall pulmonary venous diameters were 17.1 +/- 3.6 mm. Applying Bland-Altman analysis, vessel diameters differed by a mean of 0.1 mm + 2.1 mm/-2.0 mm (mean +/- 2 SD), indicating close agreement between both techniques. Interobserver variability was higher for CENTRA-keyhole (mean = 0.1 mm; mean +/- 2 SD: +2.5 mm/-2.3 mm) compared to conventional technique (0.0 mm; +1.6 mm/-1.5 mm), corresponding to a percentual deviation (mean +/- 2 SD) of the mean diameter of approximately +/- 15% (keyhole CE-CMRA) and +/- 10% (conventional CE-CMRA), respectively. Using keyhole-based time-resolved CE-CMRA, the contrast between pulmonary veins versus aorta/pulmonary artery was significantly increased (p < 0.05), which improved vessel depiction. In 12 cases, the contrast bolus arrival was delayed in one of the pulmonary veins by 1 dynamic frame (= 1.6 seconds); in 7 cases by 2 frames (= 3.2 seconds) and in 1 subject by 3 frames (= 4.8 seconds). The bolus usually appeared first in the upper right pulmonary vein whereas a delay occurred most often in the lower left pulmonary vein.CONCLUSIONSConventional CE-CMRA may be advantageous for accurate vessel size measures as evidenced by superior interobserver reproducibility in this study. Multi-dynamic CE-CMRA using CENTRA-keyhole with SENSE, however, allows for improved arterio-venous separation of pulmonary vessels and additional dynamical information on pulmonary venous perfusion, while maintaining high spatial resolution. Exact bolus timing is no longer needed.

Ultrafast time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D pulmonary venous cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography using SENSE combined with CENTRA-keyhole.