English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The issue of statutory interpretation, and the assistance to be gleaned in that process from pre-legislative and Parliamentary materials, has been on the minds of various Supreme Court justices in recent times. The recent judgment in  Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens and O  contains important warnings for practitioners wishing to rely on these materials but, furthermore, highlights what appears to be a sustained retreat from a more purposive, contextual style of interpretation into a more strictly literal approach. Such a trend would be constitutionally concerning, particularly at this time of legislative overhaul.

Statutory Interpretation after PRCBC and O v SSHD : Should we ‘Waste the Court’s Time a Great Deal Less in Looking at Background Material’?