English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Objectives.  This crossover pilot study aimed to compare the physical load response of an ergonomically improved welding torch versus a conventional torch.  Methods . Ten inexperienced volunteers performed an experimental augmented virtual welding trial at chest height (ASME code 1G) and overhead (ASME code 4G) with both welding torches in random order. Skeletal muscle load and fatigue were assessed by surface electromyography and changes in isometric peak force. The sensation of pain, perceived exertion and welding execution quality were defined as further outcome parameters.  Results . The muscle load response in three out of eight muscles was lower in favour of the ergonomic welding torch, which went along with a lower sensation of pain and a higher working accuracy.  Conclusions . An ergonomically improved welding torch reduces the acute physical load response and sensation of pain, which ultimately allows performing better, and might contribute to prevention of musculoskeletal diseases in the long term.

An ergonomic welding torch reduces physical load response and improves welding quality in novices: a pilot study