English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

What determines provision of public goods in multiethnic Kyrgyzstan? While much existing research prioritizes the explanatory power of ethnic diversity, this article argues that Soviet policies of indigenization and positive promotion of ethnic titular groups, when paired with reliance on informal networks of access for goods and services, have had path-dependent effects on the manner in which government resources are distributed. Through large-N statistical analysis, ethnic Kyrgyz titulars are shown to be favored in public goods provisioning in an additive fashion through the top-down and bottom-up mechanisms of coethnic favoritism in supply of resources and demands through informal networks, respectively.

Whose Ties Still Bind? Ethnic Domination, Informal Social Networks, and Public Goods Provision in Kyrgyzstan