English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Asian Americans occupy an ambivalent position in the U.S. racial hierarchy. An organization called Students for Fair Admissions prepared a lawsuit against the admission process in Harvard University. In October 2019, it was concluded that although “not perfect,” Harvard’s policies did not intentionally discriminate against Asian Americans. I analyzed comments about the verdict in The New York Times, The Washington Post, and The Wall Street Journal, and found that Asian Americans were afforded low relatability as Americans. I further propose that concepts of “injured privilege” and “misplaced ressentiment” could move conversations about Asian Americans’ experiences beyond the “model minority” discourse.

Injured Privilege and Misplaced Ressentiment: Unpacking Reactions toward Asian Americans after Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) V. Harvard