English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article examines Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, in which the plaintiffs allege Harvard University’s admissions program discriminates against Asian Americans. By reframing anti-Black opposition to affirmative action within the progressive discourse of defending Asian Americans, SFFA mobilizes an anti-racist argument in hopes of achieving a post-racist outcome. I contend that this rhetorical gesture exemplifies a larger discursive strategy I call multicultural anti-racism, which appropriates the language of anti-racism and redeploys it in service of expanding racial violence.

Multicultural Anti-Racism: Anti-Blackness and Asian Americans in Students for Fair Admissions V. Harvard