English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this paper, we consider a class of constrained optimization problems whose constraints involve a cardinality or rank constraint. The penalty formulation based on a partial regularization has recently been promoted in the literature to approximate these problems, which usually outperforms the penalty formulation based on a full regularization in terms of solution quality. Nevertheless, the relation between the penalty formulation with a partial regularizer and the original problem was not much studied yet. Under some suitable assumptions, we show that the penalty formulation based on a partial regularization is an exact reformulation of the original problem in the sense that they both share the same global minimizers. We also show that a local minimizer of the original problem is that of the penalty reformulation. These results provide some theoretical justification for the often-observed superior performance of the penalty model based on a partial regularizer over a corresponding full regularizer.

Exact penalization for cardinality and rank-constrained optimization problems via partial regularization