English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This study administered an updated version of Gabbidon and Preston's ( 2003 ) survey, which provided an overview of Race and Crime courses, to 48 criminal justice faculty who had experience teaching a Race and Crime course. Descriptive statistics revealed that: (1) less than half of faculty members’ universities required Race and Crime at the undergraduate level; and (2) more than half of faculty members’ universities did not offer Race and Crime at the graduate level. Most faculty (88%) rated their overall experience teaching Race and Crime positively. Sixty percent of faculty considered teaching Race and Crime more emotionally exhausting than other courses they taught, but 56% of faculty also indicated that teaching Race and Crime was more emotionally rewarding. Bivariate analyses generally failed to find significant differences between nonwhite and white faculty on these measures.

Faculty Perspectives on Teaching a Race and Crime Course: A Replication and Expansion