English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In November 2022, OpenAI has introduced ChatGPT, a chatbot based onsupervised and reinforcement learning. Not only can it answer questionsemulating human-like responses, but it can also generate code from scratch orcomplete coding templates provided by the user. ChatGPT can generate uniqueresponses which render any traditional anti-plagiarism tool useless. Itsrelease has ignited a heated debate about its usage in academia, especially bystudents. We have found, to our surprise, that our students at POLITEHNICAUniversity of Bucharest (UPB) have been using generative AI tools (ChatGPT andits predecessors) for solving homework, for at least 6 months. We therefore setout to explore the capabilities of ChatGPT and assess its value for educationalpurposes. We solved all our coding assignments for the semester from our UPBFunctional Programming course. We discovered that, although ChatGPT providescorrect answers in 68% of the cases, only around half of those are legiblesolutions which can benefit students in some form. On the other hand, ChatGPThas a very good ability to perform code review on student programming homework.Based on these findings, we discuss the pros and cons of ChatGPT in education.

ChatGPT in the classroom. Exploring its potential and limitations in a Functional Programming course