English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Understanding the association between insurance status and survival in an evolving US healthcare system remains a challenge but is essential to address healthcare disparities. We utilized National Cancer Database to evaluate the effects of insurance type on one-month mortality and overall survival (OS) in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia. Among patients &lt;65 years, one-month mortality was worse for uninsured patients and patients with Medicare compared to patients with private insurance. OS was similar between patients with private insurance and uninsured patients but worse for patients with Medicare and Medicaid/other government insurance. In multivariate analysis, older age and greater comorbidity burden conferred worse OS. For patients ≥65 years, insurance type did not affect one-month mortality and OS. Older age, greater comorbidity burden, and treatment at non-academic centers conferred worse one-month mortality and OS. Our results highlight healthcare disparities based on insurance types for both younger and older patients.

Association of insurance types and outcomes in acute promyelocytic leukemia