English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This study aimed at chemical variability of flower essential oils of 10 well-known cultivars of  Paeonia  ×  suffruticosa  Andr. The essential oil yields ranged as 0.19–0.67% ( w/w ). The chemical compositions varied with cultivars. ‘Xueying Taohua’ essential oil had predominance of citronellol (56.4%). ‘Guifei Chacui’ essential oil was rich in citronellol (35.9%) and phloroglucinol trimethyl ether (25.3%). ‘Sheng Gejin’ and ‘Yuhou Fengguang’ essential oils were rich in phloroglucinol trimethyl ether (36.5%, 26.8%). ‘Yinhong Qiaodui’ essential oil contained geraniol + nerol (23.9%). Those from the other five cultivars did not present typical chemotypes. Nevertheless several compounds were noted, mainly germacrene D, heptadeca-6,9-diene, ( Z )-hex-3-en-1-ol and linalool oxide (furan). ‘Luhe Hong’ essential oil contained the most unique components, including α-cadinol, τ-muurolol and δ-cadinene. Lack of phenylethyl alcohol was noticeable in some essential oil samples as compared with hydrolate extracts investigated previously. Multivariate analyses revealed four distinct clusters from all the essential oil samples.

Chemical variability of flower essential oils of ten well-known cultivars of Paeonia × suffruticosa Andr