English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Objective : To investigate the effect of nutritional support on nutritional status and clinical outcomes of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods : Sixty-one patients with TBI from the intensive care unit and neurosurgery of Xianyang Central Hospital from 2017 to 2019 were retrospectively included. General and clinical data of the study subjects were collected. The control group ( n  = 28) received parenteral nutrition alone, and the observation group ( n  = 33) received parenteral nutrition combined with enteral nutrition. The general conditions and biochemical indicators of both groups of patients were divided into two groups of ≤8 and ≥9 for stratified analysis to compare the nutritional support status and infection complications during hospitalization Occurrence, ICU length of stay, total length of stay, total cost of stay, and prognostic indicators of the patients were analyzed and compared. Results : There were no significant differences in biochemical indicators between both groups of patients when they were discharged. Among patients with GCS ≤8 points, the incidence of lung infection in the observer was significantly higher than that in the control group ( P  &lt; 0.001), but the incidence of intracranial infection, stress ulcers, and diarrhea was not statistically different from that in the control group ( P  = 0.739). No significant differences were observed in hospitalization time and hospitalization costs between both groups ( P  = 0.306 and  P  = 0.079, respectively). The observation group was significantly better than the control group in GSC score and long-term quality of life score ( P  = 0.042 and  P  = 0.025, respectively). When GCS was ≥ 9 points, there was no statistical difference in the incidence of lung infections and intracranial infections between both groups of patients ( P  = 0.800 and  P  = 0.127, respectively). The observation group was significantly higher than the control group in terms of length of hospital stay, nasal feeding time and hospitalization costs ( P  &lt; 0.001,  P  &lt; 0.001 and  P  = 0.006, respectively). The observation group was significantly better than the control group in GSC score and long-term quality of life score ( P  = 0.001 and  P  = 0.015, respectively). There was no significant difference in the incidence of pulmonary infection and intracranial infection between both groups of patients ( P  = 0.800 and  P  = 0.127, respectively). Conclusion : Enteral nutrition combined with parenteral nutrition intervention has a positive effect on the clinical prognosis of TBI patients.

Enteral combined with parenteral nutrition improves clinical outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury