English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Computational models are increasingly used to assess spine biomechanics and support surgical planning. However, varying levels of model verification and validation, along with characterization of uncertainty effects limit the level of confidence in their predictive potential. The objective was to assess the credibility of an adult spine deformity instrumentation model for proximal junction failure (PJF) analysis using the ASME V&amp;V40:2018 framework. To assess model applicability, the surgery, erected posture, and flexion movement of actual clinical cases were simulated. The loads corresponding to PJF indicators for a group of asymptomatic patients and a group of PJF patients were compared. Model consistency was demonstrated by finding PJF indicators significantly higher for the simulated PJF vs. asymptomatic patients. A detailed sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification were performed to further establish the model credibility.

computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering

Credibility assessment of patient-specific biomechanical models to investigate proximal junctional failure in clinical cases with adult spine deformity using ASME V&amp;V40 standard