English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Research suggests that tests with non-modified response formats may be biased against learnerswithsevere physical disabilities, with test scores reflecting the extent of learners’ disabilities rather than their actualpotential. This study aimed to compare the performance of learners with severe physical impairments on theirmathematics scores using two different response modes. Forty-two learners from schools in the Gauteng provincein South Africa were selected for the study. A cross-over within-groups design was used. Participants were randomlyassigned to two groups; each learner participated in both conditions (oral response and eye gaze), but in theopposite order. The tests were repeated after a week when the alternative response mode was used. Participants’scores for the eye-gaze response mode were found to be significantly higher than their scores for the oral responsemode. Implications for use in the classroom are discussed.

Comparing Two Response Modes in a Mathematics Test for Learners in Foundation Phase with Severe Physical Disabilities: A South African Example