English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Irving Fisher dedicated  Stabilizing the Dollar  (1920) to Simon Newcomb for anticipating him “in proposing plans for stabilizing monetary units.” The congruence of Newcomb’s and Fisher’s monetary theories and reform proposals was not as straightforward as Fisher’s book dedication suggested. Their plans had different theoretical roots: Fisher’s compensated dollar plan was the outcome of his quantity theory of money, while Newcomb held a classical monetary theory. We compare Newcomb’s and Fisher’s plans to stabilise the dollar and explore the theoretical rationales behind them offering an illustration of how similar proposals can be the result of different theories.

Irving Fisher, Simon Newcomb, and their plans to stabilize the dollar