English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Thorough and systematic surveys of host associations of  Anastrepha fraterculus  and  Ceratitis capitata  are lacking in Uruguay. Our aim was to establish the host status in field conditions and the pattern of use of different fruit species in agroecosystems and wild environments in Uruguay. Tephritid monitoring was conducted in citrus and deciduous fruit orchards using McPhail traps baited with four PBX® yeast/borax pellets. A survey of host fruits was conducted by collecting fruits in commercial and non-commercial orchards and wild vegetation.  Ceratitis capitata  and  A. fraterculus  were the only two economically important fruit fly species recorded.  Ceratitis capitata  prevailed in citrus groves and deciduous fruit orchards associated with commercial and disturbed environments whereas  A. fraterculus  was associated mostly with non-commercial fruits and undisturbed ecosystems. The differences in abundance of  C. capitata  and  A. fraterculus  observed in different hosts and ecosystems may be related to factors such as host association, resource competition, environmental conditions and parasitism, among others that are discussed.

Fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and hosts association in different ecosystems in Uruguay