English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

To understand the role of affected upper extremity (UE) self-efficacy for explaining daily-hand-use in individuals post-stroke. Specifically, to describe UE self-efficacy and to assess the associations between UE self-efficacy to UE motor and functional capacity and daily hand-use. This cross-sectional study included individuals post-stroke receiving rehabilitation with high UE functional capacity [Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) &gt; 50]. The Rating of Everyday Arm-Use in the Community and Home (REACH) assessed perceived UE daily use and the Confidence in Arm and Hand Movement scale (CAHM) assessed UE self-efficacy. Functional capacity was assessed by the ARAT and the Fugl-Meyer-motor-assessment assessed motor impairment. Correlations between measures were assessed. Twenty-two individuals, aged 19–80, with high UE functional capacity [median (IQR) ARAT-56.5 (54–57)] and varying UE self-efficacy [median (IQR) CAHM-76.7 (58–84.4)], were included. UE self-efficacy was significantly correlated with the ARAT ( r s= 0.53,  p  &lt; 0.01) and REACH ( r s= 0.51,  p  &lt; 0.01) but ARAT was not significantly correlated with REACH. UE self-efficacy is correlated with perceived daily hand-use in individuals with high functional capacity. Further research and a deeper understanding of the clinical implications of UE self-efficacy are warranted. UE self-efficacy should perhaps be assessed during rehabilitation.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONIndividuals with stroke with high affected upper extremity functional capacity do not necessarily use this hand for daily living.Upper extremity self-efficacy is correlated with perceived daily hand-use in individuals with high functional capacity; participants with higher upper extremity self-efficacy also reported more daily hand-use.Upper extremity self-efficacy seems to be upper extremity task or situation-specific.Upper extremity self-efficacy should be assessed during rehabilitation and the clinical implications of (low) upper extremity self-efficacy should be further researched. Individuals with stroke with high affected upper extremity functional capacity do not necessarily use this hand for daily living. Upper extremity self-efficacy is correlated with perceived daily hand-use in individuals with high functional capacity; participants with higher upper extremity self-efficacy also reported more daily hand-use. Upper extremity self-efficacy seems to be upper extremity task or situation-specific. Upper extremity self-efficacy should be assessed during rehabilitation and the clinical implications of (low) upper extremity self-efficacy should be further researched.

Upper extremity self-efficacy correlates with daily hand-use of individuals with high functional capacity post-stroke