English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper analyzes the differences in productivity performance between exporting and non-exporting manufacturing firms in Ecuador during the period 2007–2018, using two underexplored industry classifications in this analysis: the Pavitt Taxonomy and the OECD technological intensity classification. We estimate total factor productivity (TFP) at the firm level with a modified (Gandhi, Navarro, and Rivers 2020) approach that allows us to use an additional state variable and endogenize the law of motion for productivity, which allows the past decision about exporting to affect future productivity. This approach captures the static and dynamic gains ( learning-by-exporting ) in productivity from exporting. Moreover, we test  self-selection  on the entry and exit sides of the market, and show a robustness check of the  learning-by-exporting  hypothesis by using a difference-in-difference matching estimator. Our results indicate that exporters have better productivity performance than non-exporters. We find evidence in favor of the  self-selection  on the entry and exit sides of the market. Finally, we show there are dynamic gains in productivity from exporting, supporting the  learning-by-exporting  hypothesis.

Learning-by-exporting vs. self-selection in Ecuadorian manufacturing firms: Evidence from different industry classifications