English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Using a comprehensive manually collected dataset of regulatory enforcement actions against fraud in the Chinese capital market and a difference-in-differences (DID) research design, we examine the impact of such actions on the implied cost of equity and the role of the government as the controlling shareholder in moderating this relationship. We find that regulatory enforcement actions increase firms’ cost of equity, and that government controlling shareholders can mitigate the effect of these actions. Our results are robust to various sensitivity tests, including alternative measures of the cost of equity, alternative samples, additional control variables, and an alternative DID design. Additional analysis provides supporting evidence that the effect of enforcement actions on the cost of equity arises from investors’ perception of higher long-run information risk in the case of fraud firms. Further, government controlling shareholders can mitigate the impact of such actions on the cost of equity by lowering investors’ perceived information risk.

Government Control, Regulatory Enforcement Actions, and the Cost of Equity