English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This review article aims to compare global dermatologic organizations and the clinical practice guidelines available for the use of interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitors in the treatment of psoriasis. A literature review encompassing systemic therapies for the treatment of psoriasis was conducted. Guidelines from the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD)-National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF), the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and the British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) served as the main comparators in this review. Of the American and European guidelines available for use of IL-23 inhibitors, several organizations are in agreement regarding the dosage and indications of guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab. However, there are differences as well as insufficient recommendations concerning laboratory monitoring and screenings as well as contraindications to therapy. IL-23 inhibitors are safe and efficacious therapeutic options for patients with psoriasis and should be considered as a potential first-line therapy alone or in combination with topical medications, phototherapy, and other systemic non-biologic agents. Consideration should be given to the evidence-based guidelines of global dermatologic organizations to help guide therapeutic decisions.

Comparison of psoriasis guidelines for use of IL-23 inhibitors in the United States and United Kingdom: a critical appraisal and comprehensive review