English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this theoretical paper, I examine the role and potential alterations to uses of social categories in qualitative research. Categories are socially constructed, imbued with power, and include race, class, gender, sexuality, and ability. These categories, although constructs and subject to change, hold durability and are leveraged in much of social science, including qualitative research. To engage with how difference within and across categories can be engaged in multiple ways, I describe a portion of longitudinal ethnographic data to raise up the question of what theories do what kinds of work with contested social categories. This excerpted transcript is not proposed as an exemplar or model. Building on Jackson and Mazzei methodology of reading with theory, I present the interaction as read with three theoretical frameworks: intersectionality intra-action , and Kawagley’s interconnectedness. I argue that this approach to social theories which upends and mingles the order of theory and data, surfaces important questions about what we ask categories to do, what they do to knowledge systems, and how categories themselves should be addressed through a studied use of theories.

Social categories and the differences within: a theoretical call for dynamic analyses