English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We aimed to evaluate the effect of luteal phase support (LPS) on pregnancy outcome in natural cycle frozen embryo transfer (NC-FET). We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase for related literature from start to February 2020. Relative risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) in random-effects, fixed-effects models were calculated using Review Manager 5.3. Totally 9 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed no significant difference could be found regarding chemical pregnancy rate (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.93–1.22;  I2  = 54%) and miscarriage rate (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.70–1.22;  I2  = 0%) between the LPS groups and no LPS groups in NC-FET. LPS groups has increased the rate of clinical pregnancy rate (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.12–1.34;  I2  = 52%) compared with no LPS groups. Subgroup analysis according to trigger administration also showed a significant difference between the two groups. LPS might improve the clinical pregnancy rate in NC-FET. HCG trigger for ovulating may result in luteal phase deficiency. LPS subsequently improved clinical pregnancy rate and chemical pregnancy rate for patients undergoing HCG trigger and NC-FET. This meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO, PROSPERO ID is CRD42020171758.

Luteal phase support for natural cycle frozen embryo transfer: a meta-analysis