English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In one of her least pejorative references to Joyce, Christine Brooke-Rose cites him as an example of a writer who shares with philologists a ‘dotty’ passion for the history of language. Coming in the middle of her students’ guide to Ezra Pound, this claim assigns linguistic sentiments to Joyce that Brooke-Rose would go on to express herself. In an interview nearly five years later, she describes a ‘passionate concern with language’ that borders on ‘the feeling of the sacred’: ‘I’ve always had it. I studied philology’. This essay unearths a vein of Joycean philological imaginings in Brooke-Rose's work that seeks to intertwine the textual and the biological, evoking a ‘sensuous' script from a mythical prehistory. Focusing on  Between  (1968), I trace an intricate ambivalence over the relationship between sign and matter that ultimately feeds into Brooke-Rose's attitudes towards poststructuralism, gender, and language as a whole. Hovering between the sacred and the profane, the dotty and the down-to-earth, these imaginings also serve to draw out the latent continuities between the ancient hunt for a motivated script and the contemporary search for semiosis in nature; between Babel and biosemiotics.

From Babel to biosemiotics: Christine Brooke-Rose's Joycean scripts