English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Implementation supports for teachers can significantly impact the degree to which evidence-based practices are used as intended with secondary students across settings and content areas. The present analysis focused on examining the impact of teacher implementation supports on the goals set by students with and without disabilities engaging in an evidence-based practice designed to promote self-determination, the  Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction  (SDLMI), in inclusive, secondary classes. While goal setting is central to SDLMI, there is limited research on the impact of teacher implementation supports (i.e., online only versus online + coaching supports) on the content of the goals students choose using the SDLMI, particularly in inclusive, secondary classrooms where students are learning core content. The findings suggested that the vast majority of goals set by students in inclusive, general education classes focused on academic learning and minimal differences across goals set by students with and without disabilities and across teacher implementation support groups. Implications for practice and research are provided.

Examining the Impact of Implementation Supports on Goals Set by Students in Inclusive, Secondary Classes