English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In a comment on our article ‘‘Role of Ultra-widefield Imaging in Eales’ Disease: A Case Series”, the author asserts that Widefield fluorescein angiography (FA) detected significantly more number of active vasculitis as compared to Optos in our study which is not in line with our conclusion. We agree that Widefield FA is the gold standard for detecting activity in uveitic eye, and in fact, we have mentioned that ‘FA was considered the gold standard for diagnosing active vasculitis and clinical examination and Optos findings were compared to FA’ in our Materials and methods section.

Reply to Comments on Manuscript “Role of Ultra-widefield Imaging in Eales’ Disease: A Case Series”