English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Background:  Although  in vitro  methods have disadvantages, they are still commonly used to measure nerve conduction velocity (NCV) in experimental studies. Therefore, this study was designed to demonstrate the effect of the surgical procedures required for  in vitro  methods on nerve fibers and the effect of  in vivo  and  in vitro  methods on the results of electrophysiological measurements. Methods:  Rats were assigned to the  in vivo  (control-1, injury-1, and diabetic-1) and  in vitro  (control-2, injury-2, and diabetic-2) groups. The NCV and compound action potential amplitudes were measured, and the nerve fibers were histologically examined. Results:  Damaged axons and myelin sheaths were observed in the control-2 group. The electrophysiological values of the  in vitro  groups were lower than those of the  in vivo  groups. Furthermore, these values were lower for the diabetic and injury groups than for the control groups. Conclusions:  This study showed that the surgical procedures required for the  in vitro  method reduced the measured values. Owing to the previous and current disadvantages of the  in vitro  method, the  in vivo  method was more sensitive for the NCV measurement. Moreover, measurements can be performed using the current  in vivo  method for small nerve fibers.

Surgical Procedures Required for Measurement Reduce Nerve Conduction Velocity: An In Vivo and In Vitro Comparative Study