English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This essay explores Fikret Adaman and Pat Devine’s position that democratic planning would expand human autonomy. It argues that economic democracy involving workplace democracy, private property, and widespread markets would generally be more autonomy enhancing than a system of democratic planning with social ownership and few markets. However, it acknowledges the problems ecological limits may place on the autonomy of future populations, making the choice between democratic planning and economic democracy more ambiguous.

Economic Democracy, Democratic Planning, and Human Autonomy: A Comment on Adaman and Devine