English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

A mixed-methods study was used to investigate edTPA performance differences between teacher candidates majoring in different content areas (K-12 art, music, and physical education; and 6–12 English, history, math, and science) and differences in their teacher preparation for the purpose of reflecting and improving. There were no statistically significant differences in edTPA score means (total, planning, instruction, and assessment) between 241 former candidates by content area. According to the required edTPA passing scores set by the state and university in this study, the number of candidates who passed edTPA out of the total number of candidates in each content area was reported. To further explore these findings, interviews with university subject matter experts (SMEs) were conducted and revealed program differences between content area majors—specialized coursework, field experiences, and edTPA practice activities. In light of these findings, potential implications for teacher preparation programs are discussed.

Exploring Differences in Teacher Preparation by Content Area: edTPA Scores and Subject Matter Expert Perspectives