English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In their ground-breaking experiments, Newell and Simon 1  observed that subjects did not proceed linearly but moved back and forth between decision phases. This phenomenon has been observed subsequently but has not been investigated experimentally. In this follow-up study, the impact of recursion is examined in an experiment to solve a variety of standard business intelligence tasks of increasing complexity. The actions of the subjects (managers) were analyzed and coded to reflect Simon’s decision-making phases: Intelligence, Design, and Choice. This study demonstrates that recursion does occur but does not improve accuracy and time (with one exception), nor lead to increased self-efficacy or confidence. The level of recursion was found, generally, to be unaffected if the task was more complex. Subjects assigned laptops as compared to tablets used more recursion. It is anticipated that this study will help researchers gain an improved understanding of recursion and the future design of DSSs.

Recursive Decision-Making: A Confirmation of Newell and Simon