English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Compared to the United States population as a whole, physicians are more likely to identify as men, identify as Asian or non-hispanic White, and be raised in wealthier households. Racial, ethnic, gender, and socioeconomic representation in ophthalmology is often blamed on the pipeline of matriculants. This review collects recent data from the US census, AAMC, and primary literature on gender, racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic diversity from medical school to ophthalmology practice. Data from the medical and ophthalmology literature shows that medical students are less diverse than medical school applicants, ophthalmology residencies are less diverse than graduating medical students, and ophthalmology departments are less diverse than those of most other specialties. At each level, there are limitations in representation beyond the pipeline of medical school applicants or medical students applying to ophthalmology. There are many practical steps the field can take at each level of training to move the specialty toward more equitable representation.

Diversity in Academic Ophthalmology: Disparities and Opportunities from Medical School to Practice