English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Structured record keeping improves documentation in age-related macular degeneration; however, it may have a more limited effect on the management decisions of a group of already highly trained clinicians, especially in the context of other well-embedded clinical decision support tools. Structured record keeping has been associated with a range of advantages including improved history taking and communication, reduced number of unnecessary referrals, and enhanced diagnostic accuracy. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of a structured record keeping, quality improvement tool on recording, reporting and management congruency. A before and after retrospective record review study was performed in a single academic, intermediate-tier care institute in New South Wales, Australia. The structured record keeping tool intervention captured 31 items in addition to the prior pre-existing medical record: six items relating to historical risk factors, two items relating to patient activation, 13 items signifying core clinical signs, five items for change analysis and five items regarding the ongoing patient management plan. Two hundred medical records from 151 patients with age-related macular degeneration were analysed. There was a statistically significant improvement in the number of reports that explicitly specified the number of clinical structural risk factors (from 24 to 75%; Fisher’s exact p &lt; 0.001) and risk of progression to advanced disease (from 71 to 84%; p = 0.041); however, this documentation had no statistically significant effect on the report-recommended management plan and/or the final report-recommended review period. Disease-specific, structured record keeping improves the outgoing documentation of key clinical signs and is effective in prompting the transposition of these signs into a quantified risk progression score. It has limited value in improving management consistency among a group of highly trained eye care staff.

Introduction of structured record keeping in age-related macular degeneration: a before and after study