English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Copper–gold porphyry deposits are the world’s main source of copper and a significant source of gold. They consist of vein networks and their surrounding alteration zones. Commonly the deposits are centred on narrow intrusions (stocks), but calling these deposits ‘porphyries’ is unjustified because the name carries little descriptive or genetic value. Extensional veins were formed by hydraulic fracturing of the stocks, at depths where open spaces could not be maintained and where fluid pressure approaches lithostatic pressure. The post-crystallisation timing of the veins is important because it indicates that the host stocks could not have been the direct sources of either metals or ore-forming fluids. In the traditional magmatic model, precursor batholiths, lying at depth, are  inferred  to be the sources of the Cu and Au in the overlying host stocks. In this model, the batholiths are assumed to have crystallised and produced the mineralising aqueous fluids, Cu and Au. However, in many porphyry deposits, the concept of metal and fluid supply from deeper batholiths is problematic. Neither Cu nor Au is strongly enriched during the crystallisation of silicate magmas, and although hypersaline fluids are a characteristic of Cu–Au porphyry deposits globally, the source of the Cl remains unconstrained. There is little evidence that silicate magmas can release such Cl-rich fluids, and it remains unexplained how elevated levels of Cl may be achieved in a silicate magma. Therefore, the starting assumption that these deposits formed predominantly from magmatic sources and processes is questioned. This study has selectively focused on the roles of rheology, rock mechanics, vein control, metal-enrichment processes and the sources of Cl. Non-magmatic processes may be enough to facilitate strong partitioning of Cu and Au into high-temperature, oxidising, high-salinity, hydrothermal fluids to form Cu–Au porphyry deposits.

Formation of Cu–Au porphyry deposits: hydraulic quartz veins, magmatic processes and constraints from chlorine