English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In this article Part II, we consider the application of  ienaic  modeling for solvent extraction of rare earths in the case of the mixed DMDOHEMA/HDEHP extractant system. The system exhibits a synergistic extraction effect depending on the acid concentration and the extractant mole fraction, as demonstrated in the experimental article Part I. In this work, we directly compare experimental findings with theoretical predictions of the droplet model. The model considers the effective free energy of transfer as a combination of competing molecular forces, but contrary to previous micelle models that focus only on the dominant stoichiometry, it allows calculations of free energies of every possible spherical aggregate. The resulting image of the extraction process is that different behaviors can be obtained depending on the acidity and mole fraction of extractants, which are associated with different aggregation regimes in a complex free energy landscape of the system. Nevertheless, self-assembly is tuned by the extraction of all solutes, and not only the target metal cations.

How acidity rules synergism and antagonism in liquid–liquid extraction by lipophilic extractants—Part II: application of the ienaic modelling