English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Efficient formulations used in hydrometallurgy are often based on synergistic action of two oil-soluble extractants at an optimized mole fraction. In this series of two papers, we describe the  N,N ’-dimethyl- N,N ’-dioctylhexylethoxymalonamide (DMDOHEMA)/di(2-ethylexyl) phosphoric acid (HDEHP) system, and how expression of the synergistic effect varies with acidity, using the three common representations: distribution ratios, yields, and free energies of transfer. The experimental results are detailed in this first part (Part I) with the so-called supramolecular approach, which considers the reverse micelle-like aggregates formed by the lipophilic extractant molecules. It shows that no specific aggregation state is observed at the maximum of synergism and antagonism. Besides, the critical aggregation concentration that characterizes the micellization free energy appears to follow some synergistic trends but cannot explain how acid tunes synergism to antagonism of this mixed system. Based on these results, Part II proposes a theoretical model based on the ienaic approach to interpret acid effect on synergism and antagonism.

solvent extraction and ion exchange

How Acidity Rules Synergism and Antagonism in Liquid–Liquid Extraction by Lipophilic Extractants—Part I: Determination of Nanostructures and Free Energies of Transfer