English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Adopting ‘vulnerability’ as an analytical lens and informed by a qualitative case study approach, the present study investigates two Chinese scholars’ academic writing and publishing practice. The findings reveal different sources and forms of vulnerability that influenced the participants’ professional engagements, social interactions and emotional experiences in academic writing and publishing. The findings also demonstrate how the participants developed their advanced academic literacy about writing and micropolitical literacy about publishing to cope with potential vulnerability, and went on to construct their preferred identities as academic researchers and writers. The paper ends with some practical implications on how to promote a supportive and sustainable publishing culture in higher education.

Unpacking vulnerability in academic writing and publishing: a tale of two non-native English speaker scholars in China