English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article examines young Muslim Australians’ attitudes toward implementing  Sharia  in Australia using 64 semi-structured interviews conducted in Melbourne and Geelong, Australia. We found that although the attitudes can be grouped under the main typologies of  Legal Pluralist  and  Muslim Secularist , there were a variety of responses within each category. While Legal Pluralist A wants  Sharia  to be officially implemented for Muslims in Australia, Legal Pluralist B thinks  Sharia  would be beneficial for everyone in Australia. The majority of our respondents (Muslim Secularist) think that  Sharia  is not suited for Australian state, legal system and politics. Muslim Secularist A does not think that  Sharia  offer any benefit to modern societies in any part of the world. Muslim Secularist B thinks that  Sharia  cannot be applied in Australia that has to remain secular because of the religious diversity of the population and  Sharia  is more useful for Muslim-majority countries. Religiosity does not predict any of these typologies in our participant group since, with few exceptions, all identified themselves as religious Muslims.

Muslim Secularism by Conduct: Attitudes of Young Australian Muslims to Legal Pluralism and Sharia