English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

As tensions around the politics of race, ethnicity, and culture move back toward the centre stage of politics in the global north, it becomes ever more important to investigate how social relations between diverse groups play out in everyday urban life. Many studies of urban diversity rely on in-depth interviews or focus groups reflecting on the topic as their main method, while the growing number that include observation in public often say little about what these methods contribute specifically. I argue that to describe and understand social relations in multiethnic cities, we need to use methods that are appropriate to the register of urban public space — methods that match and capture the kinds of interactions and expressions of views that occur in public. I discuss the strengths and limitations of methods that help achieve this objective. I call them ‘pop-up ethnography’, a term that reflects both their serendipitous development and their contrast at social and spatial levels with traditional immersive ethnography. Place still matters as we try to understand everyday cohabitation in diverse cities.

Pop-Up Ethnography: Methods for Studying Social Relations at the Register of Urban Public Space