English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Arsenic (As) contamination in ground water is raising concerns due to indiscriminate irrigation for a large variety of crops. Therefore, it is a challenge to reduce As uptake in relation to safe human consumption either by reducing water supply or by improving water quality without major yield losses. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design (RBD) replicated four times with five water management treatments  viz . T 1  = 100% shallow tube well (STW), T 2  = 25% STW + 75% pond water (PW), T 3  = 75% STW + 25% PW, T 4  = 50% STW + 50% PW andT 5  = 100% PW with broccoli (cv. Green Magic) as a test crop in an As-affected village of Ghetugachi, West Bengal, India. Plant and soil samples were collected during harvesting. The calculated hazard quotient (HQ) suggests that despite having higher yield, As content in broccoli under T 1  is unfit for human consumption. T 2  having a low HQ (0.564) and moderate crop water productivity (CWP) and irrigation water productivity (IWP) values (5.46 and 8.07, respectively) is marked as safest. T 4  with moderately high HQ (0.776) and fairly high CWP and IWP (5.62 and 8.31, respectively) can be considered for areas having relatively less contamination.

Mitigation of arsenic in broccoli through consumptive use of ground water and pond water as sources for irrigation