English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This is a commentary on Adair and Lozano’s (2022) article, “Adaptive Choice: Psychological Perspectives on Abortion and Reproductive Freedom.” We offer a critique of its underlying premise that abortion must be justified and identify three substantive concerns. Then, we outline a better way to study abortion, one that draws on feminist and reproductive justice scholarship by: centering the lived experience of real people and their needs; holding that it is a fundamental human right of people to reproduce if and when they desire; and conducting research that benefits people, with a focus on those who are socially marginalized.

The Problem with “Justifying” Abortion: Why Real Reproductive Justice Cannot Be Achieved by Theorizing the Legitimacy of Abortion