English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Although populism in the global North countries has advanced during the last two decades as an anti-immigrant ideology, demographers have shown concerns about the aging of populations in those countries and have suggested encouraging replacement migration policies to mitigate such aging effects. It is the classical liberal paradox – to claim the general need for immigration and then to reject immigrants. From a political and economic point of view, we are called to bring to the fore the relationship between labor and productivity transformations, on the one hand, and demographic crisis, on the other. In fact, the need for migrations is never generalized, but specific. Over the last decades, qualified and highly qualified migration has boomed, consolidating globally the presence of migrant labor in technological, scientific and financial sectors. We attempt to investigate migration in aging knowledge societies, as a result of complementary processes whereby immigrants are differentially included as labor force, and socially discriminated via selective immigration policies, which barely consolidates the reproduction of global social injustice.

Migration in knowledge aging societies. Differentiating labor force and discriminating people