English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article examines a period of experimentation in transportation technology and policy in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania as the city transitioned from a finalist position in an interurban “smart city” competition to an autonomous vehicle research venture with Uber. Drawing upon analysis of policy documents, review of press accounts, and interviews with local stakeholders, I focus specifically on the contestation that emerged from the efforts of city leaders to advance an ideal of “inclusive innovation” throughout this phase of Pittsburgh’s development agenda. I argue that the experimental ethos of smart city approaches compounded by the economic imperatives of entrepreneurial urbanism challenged attempts to connect the city’s innovation agenda to inclusive development goals and introduced tensions over local autonomy at multiple stages of the process. The Pittsburgh case poses broader implications for efforts to promote equitable development within technocratic and entrepreneurial smart city programs.

Contested autonomy in “smart” and “inclusive” innovation: test-driving transportation technology and policy in Pittsburgh