English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

To compare the inter-camera performance and consistency of various deep learning (DL) diagnostic algorithms applied to fundus images taken from desktop Topcon and portable Optain cameras. Participants over 18 years of age were enrolled between November 2021 and April 2022. Pair-wise fundus photographs from each patient were collected in a single visit; once by Topcon (used as the reference camera) and once by a portable Optain camera (the new target camera). These were analyzed by three previously validated DL models for the detection of diabetic retinopathy (DR), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON). Ophthalmologists manually analyzed all fundus photos for the presence of DR and these were referred to as the ground truth. Sensitivity, specificity, the area under the curve (AUC) and agreement between cameras (estimated by Cohen’s weighted kappa, K) were the primary outcomes of this study. A total of 504 patients were recruited. After excluding 12 photographs with matching errors and 59 photographs with low quality, 906 pairs of Topcon-Optain fundus photos were available for algorithm assessment. Topcon and Optain cameras had excellent consistency (Κ=0.80) when applied to the referable DR algorithm, while AMD had moderate consistency (Κ=0.41) and GON had poor consistency (Κ=0.32). For the DR model, Topcon and Optain achieved a sensitivity of 97.70% and 97.67% and a specificity of 97.92% and 97.93%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two camera models (McNemar’s test: x 2 =0.08,  p  = .78). Topcon and Optain cameras had excellent consistency for detecting referable DR, albeit performances for detecting AMD and GON models were unsatisfactory. This study highlights the methods of using pair-wise images to evaluate DL models between reference and new fundus cameras.

current eye research

Cross-camera Performance of Deep Learning Algorithms to Diagnose Common Ophthalmic Diseases: A Comparative Study Highlighting Feasibility to Portable Fundus Camera Use