English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Performing laser retinopexy through multifocal intraocular lenses may be challenging due to aberrations of the peripheral retinal view. This study investigated the influence of multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses on outcomes of laser retinopexy for retinal tears. Pseudophakic eyes (multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses) that underwent in-office laser retinopexy for retinal tears, with a minimum follow-up of 3 months, were retrospectively analyzed. Eyes with multifocal intraocular lenses were matched to controls with monofocal intraocular lenses in a 1:2 ratio for age, gender, number, and location of retinal tears. The main outcome measure was the rate of complications. We included 168 eyes in the study. Fifty-six eyes (51 patients) with multifocal intraocular lenses were matched with 112 eyes (112 patients) with monofocal intraocular lenses. The mean follow-up was 26 months. Baseline characteristics were similar between two groups. No significant differences were noted in the rate of successful laser retinopexy without additional procedures (91% vs. 86% at 3 months and 79% vs. 74% during follow-up, in the multifocal intraocular lens and monofocal intraocular lens group, respectively). No significant differences were observed in the rate of subsequent rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (multifocal, 4% vs. monofocal, 6%,  p =.716) or need for additional laser retinopexy for new tears (14% vs. 15%;  p =.939). The surgery rates for vitreous hemorrhage (0% vs. 3%;  p =.537), epiretinal membrane (2% vs. 2%;  p =.553), and vitreous floaters (5% vs. 2%,  p =.422) were not significantly different. Visual outcomes were also similar. Multifocal intraocular lenses did not appear to negatively impact the outcomes of in-office laser retinopexy for retinal tears.

Outcomes of Laser Retinopexy for Retinal Tears in Pseudophakic Eyes with Multifocal Versus Monofocal Intraocular Lenses: A Matched Cohort Study