English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Wearable accelerometry devices quantify on-field frequency and severity of head impacts to further improve sport safety. Commonly employed post-data collection cleaning techniques may affect these outcomes. Our purpose was to compare game impact rates and magnitudes between three different cleaning levels (Level-1: impacts recorded within start and end times, Level-2: impacts during pauses/breaks removed, Level-3: video verified) for male youth tackle football. Participants ( n  = 23, age = 10.9 ± 0.3 yrs, height = 150.0 ± 8.3 cm, mass = 41.6 ± 8.4 kg) wore Triax SIM-G sensors throughout Fall 2019. Impact rates, ratios (IRRs), and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were used to compare levels. Random-effects general linear models were used to compare peak linear acceleration (PLA;g) and angular velocity (PAV;rads/s). Level-1 resulted in higher impact rates (4.57; 95%CI = 4.14–5.05) compared to Level-2 (3.09; 95%CI = 2.80–3.42; IRR = 1.48; 95%CI = 1.34–1.63) and Level-3 datasets (2.56; 95%CI = 2.30–2.85; IRR = 1.78; 95%CI = 1.60–1.98). Level-2 had higher impact rates compared to Level-3 (1.21; 95%CI = 1.08–1.35). Level-1 resulted in higher PAV than Level-2 and Level-3 ( p  &lt; 0.001) datasets. PLA did not differ across datasets ( p  = 0.296). Head impact data should be filtered of pauses/breaks, and does not substantially differ outcome estimates compared to time-intensive video verification.

Quantifying head impact biomechanical differences between commonly employed cleaning levels: a critical research interpretation consideration