English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The case of  Synedra pelagica  Hendey is discussed in terms of its nomenclature, the taxonomic implications of priority issues and its characterization. Application of replacement names for specific epithets is reasonably straightforward as it is governed by the ICN – conditions for valid publication of any taxonomic name can be satisfied even if no one can subsequently identify the taxon. The lack of clear diagnostic characters, as opposed to a description, can obscure what the name actually represents. These issues are briefly discussed with  Synedra pelagica  in mind.

Names, diagnoses and ‘Dead Names’: the case of Synedra pelagica