English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Research has explored U.S. intelligence core teams at the cultural and functional levels. How intelligence officers respond to toxic interpersonal relationships remains unexplored. A May 2021 grounded theory and situational analysis study of variations of responses to workplace toxicity in the core mission identified nine response patterns and three impacts to mission support. The study also found that power, agency, and acumen played central roles, along with relational ambiguity and toxic memory as contextual factors. The findings generated five research propositions.

Relationships, power, and ambiguity: how do U.S. intelligence officer responses to toxicity affect support to the core mission?