English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Quality control is an outstanding area of production management. The effectiveness of applied quality control methods strongly depends on the performance of the measurement system. Many researchers aimed to analyze the effect of measurement errors on conformity or process control and proposed solutions to treat measurement uncertainty. Although both risk-based conformity control and process control solutions have been designed, verification and validation of these methods have not been provided through laboratory experiments. This paper proposes a case study from the automotive industry regarding the application of risk-based conformity control and risk-based control charts. Acceptance intervals and control limits are optimized to minimize the loss associated with incorrect decisions. The optimization is conducted assuming two scenarios: first, the process and measurement errors are simulated, and second, all data points are measured in the laboratory. This study verifies the applicability of risk-based approaches to real industrial problems and compares the results obtained by simulations and experiments, providing information about the achievable cost reduction opportunities granted by simulations.

Validation of risk-based quality control techniques: a case study from the automotive industry