English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

A new experiment tested — and confirmed — the hypothesis that being the perpetrator of the discrimination of the minority subsequently makes one perceive this minority as more threatening. The experimental procedure assumed that the act of marking corrections of the linguistic errors of a person was a performative act that improves the image of competence of the corrector and worsens that of the corrected. The experiment ( N  = 147) followed a factorial design, 2 (author of the text:  a young Gypsy  vs.  a young person ) x 2 ( making corrections  vs.  refraining from making corrections ). Intergroup threat anxiety shows that discrimination against the minority increases the threat anxiety that is associated with a subsequent interaction with it. We conclude that being the perpetrator of the minority discrimination causes the majority to perceive the minority as more threatening. We discuss how this discrimination itself ends up transforming the representation of those minorities.

Does threat cause discrimination or does discrimination cause threat? ( ¿La amenaza causa la discriminación o la discriminación causa la amenaza? )