English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

During and since the Pinochet dictatorship, Chile has entertained and implemented new criminal justice policies and practices. Many of these ideas originated in the United States, and are tied to neoliberal initiatives. Advocates of these new initiatives, both inside and outside Chile, equate them to panaceas, and solely and/or disproportionately emphasise the benefits that can be achieved by implementing these policies and practices, while neglecting their downsides, particularly the growing empirical evidence which calls into question some of these developments. This article documents Chile’s experience with the new neoliberal criminal justice initiatives that have been considered, where they have gained traction, which constituencies championed their merits, and which policies and practices were eventually chosen and implemented. This case study concludes with a series of hypotheses amenable for testing.

“A grandes cautelas, otras mayores”: importing neoliberal criminal justice policies and practices into chile